By Jessica Litman
In 1998, copyright lobbyists succeeded in persuading Congress to enact legislation vastly increasing copyright owners' regulate over individuals' inner most makes use of in their works. The efforts to implement those new rights have led to hugely publicised criminal battles among proven media, and new upstarts. during this enlightening and well-argued booklet, legislations professor Jessica Litman questions no matter if copyright legislation crafted via attorneys and their lobbyists quite make experience for the majority of us. should still each interplay among usual shoppers and copyright-protected works be constrained through legislations? Is it functional to implement such legislation, or anticipate shoppers to obey them? What are the results of such legislation at the trade of data in a loose society? Litman's critique exposes the 1998 copyright legislation as an incoherent patchwork. She argues for reforms that mirror logic and how humans truly behave of their day-by-day electronic interactions. This paperback variation contains an afterword that reviews on fresh advancements, corresponding to the tip of the Napster tale, the increase of peer-to-peer dossier sharing, the escalation of a full-fledged copyright battle, the submitting of court cases opposed to hundreds of thousands of people, and the June 2005 ideally suited court docket selection within the Grokster case.
Read or Download Digital Copyright: Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet PDF
Similar intellectual property books
Content material Rights for inventive pros is for pros and scholars operating in all components of media (film/video, images, multimedia, net, pictures, and broadcast) who want to know what the legislation calls for and the way they need to adequately make the most of copyrights and logos. This booklet outlines serious suggestions and applies them with factors in real-life functions, together with many situations from the author's personal perform in addition to these of assorted media execs.
Contributions to this omnibus quantity from twenty-seven the world over well known students will introduce scholars of philosophy, technological know-how, and theology to the present nation of analysis and a number of views at the paintings of Albert the nice.
During this quantity fifteen contributions talk about the position or roles of early glossy ('literary' and non-literary) varieties of theatre within the formation of public opinion or its use in making statements in public or inner most debates.
This e-book has arisen from the convention entitled 'The form of the arrival agricultural biotechnology transformation: strategic funding and coverage techniques from an fiscal viewpoint' convened via the foreign Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology study (ICABR), held in Rome, June 17-19, 1999.
- The Unauthorized Biography of the Baby Bells & Info-Scandal
- Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets - What Automation Professionals, Manufacturers, and Business Owners Need to Know
- Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest
- Asian Data Privacy Laws: Trade & Human Rights Perspectives
- Starting & Running a Successful Newsletter or Magazine
Additional resources for Digital Copyright: Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet
The broadcast industry formed its own performing rights society to compete with ASCAP. The recording industry developed a form license that incorporated the basic concept of a compulsory license for mechanical reproduction, but at more favorable COPYRIGHT AND COMPROMISE 49 terms, and used it instead of the license conferred by the statute. The motion picture industry established an ASCAP-like operation to deal with unauthorized exhibition of films. An enterprising group of talking machine manufacturers used the copyright exemption for the performance of musical compositions on coin-operated devices to launch the jukebox industry, and marketed jukeboxes to establishments that wished to play music but not to pay royalties.
Yet, the compromises that were made emerged only after face-to-face bargaining, either within the conferences or at the last minute in response to congressional pressure. The parties had an interest in drafting legislation that Congress would enact. That interest should have persuaded them to incorporate language that absent groups would find acceptable. The pressures of the negotiation process, however, made it difficult to accommodate groups who were not participating in the bargaining. The division of rights among competing interests became increasingly complex and interdependent.
Joined by motion picture producers, they simultaneously pressed the Register to define the public performance right more broadly.